Shadow a Student Challenge

The third year of Shadow a Student challenge begins tomorrow and runs for the next two weeks. However, with all three administrators in the building I work in participating in the challenge, we had to get a bit creative with scheduling, which meant that I shadowed a student Friday, before the challenge officially began.

Before I get into what I saw and some reflections from the day, I can’t emphasize this strongly enough: administrators, counselors, district leaders – GO DO THIS. It was great to leave the radio in my office for the day and be out seeing the school from a student’s perspective.

I was really glad the way the schedule broke for the tenth grader I was shadowing, Lily. I spent the morning in two electives, cooking and metals. Though they were two different classes, I was really struck by how quickly and obvious feedback was in both of those classes. Mistakes – or areas that needed improvement – were generally pretty obvious and there were opportunities to fix them.

In cooking, Lily was making shakshuka with a partner. The end of the recipe called for a poached egg, which the two students were a bit fuzzy about how to go about making. After one attempt, they called the teacher over and asked how it looked.

“That looks like a fried egg, not a poached egg.”

The successfully poached egg

The students then problem-solved for how to get more of a liquid base in what they had made (this involved a smaller pot and some water) and immediately tried – and were successful – in poaching an egg.

How many classes do students get opportunities like this, to make a big mistake, and then see the error, and correct it immediately? In the conversation with Lily and her partner, they both felt like cooking and metals – the class they both had next – were the two classes that they felt like they could fail most safely in, where the mistakes they made were pretty easily visible to them and/or the teacher and were able to be corrected quickly.

Metals bore this out. Lily spent the metals period cutting then shaping a cylindrical metal rod into a screwdriver head. Showers of sparks from a grinder cutting the metal rod? Acetylene torches heating metal super hot so it can be shaped into the screwdriver on an anvil? Yeah. That all went down. Plus some students were welding, others were operating drills, etc.

Props to shop teachers – the amount of teaching you need to do around safe use of tools then the trust you need to have that students know how to properly and safely operate this machinery: not for the faint of heart for sure!

I was again struck by the ease of feedback in this class. At one point, when the screwdriver head was being flattened on the torch and anvil, the teacher stopped Lily and asked her to hold up the screwdriver. It was starting to get a bit curved.

“Oh. Yeah. I can fix that. Thanks, Harmon.” (Mr. Harmon teaches her metals class.)

Before and after shots

Feedback was quick, and the fix was immediate: more time was spent on one side of the screwdriver head than the other. And at the end of the class, you could see how much had gotten done: from metal rod to something that looked like a screwdriver head.

Unfortunately, I lost Lily at lunch when I ran back to the office to grab my food. However, I was able to catch up with her for her afternoon of French and science. Though the content of both classes was very different, both showed a lot of trust in students to direct their own learning. Whether it was a chunk of time creating a children’s book in the past tense or time to mess with acids and bases to create a neutral solution, students were given a goal and trusted to go and pursue it.

Both classes also demonstrated the power of social learning. Whether it was checking in with her table group when she had a question on her French book, or arguing about whether to add more acid or base to try to neutralize the solution then had already created, Lily’s afternoon had ample opportunity for both self-directed work time as well as time to work with and learn from her peers in the class.


This is more of a report and brief reflection on the day. Unfortunately, I left my notes from the day and the Shadow a Student Challenge packet at school over the weekend. I’ll pick up the reflective and debrief pieces from that packet and relook at my notes and hopefully have a few more things to say.

I’m also excited to sit down with other administrators in my building and district and chat about what we saw, what we learned, and most importantly what sort of actions we are going to take based on our opportunities to shadow a student.

Student Voice Forum Reflections

table 20
Table 20!

I was lucky enough to get to attend the School District 42 student forum for grades ten through twelve students this past week. Conversations focused on motivation, belonging, and life after grad. These three topics were chosen through school visits that got students thinking about the most important parts of school and concerns or questions they had in these areas. Interestingly, were I to have chosen topics to chat about with a group of 160 secondary students from across the district, I think that my list would have looked remarkably similar.

The core of the day for me was a set of table conversations that I got to facilitate around the three focus areas for students from a cross section of the secondary schools in my district. Though a lot was shared, a few themes stood out to me.

In terms of motivation and belonging, students talked about the importance of relationships with the adults in schools as the huge key in this area. Is this a surprise? No. Is it an important reminder? Absolutely. Students talked about having real conversations with adults, about school employees taking the time to notice when they were having a bad day, about adults being willing to be vulnerable and acknowledge when they were struggling, about conversations about what was going on in the broader world, not just the confines of the subject area they were involved in in their classrooms.

The other area students at my table stressed was around relevancy. Whether it was the material of a subject or dealing with life after grad, students emphasized that seeing the relevance in the material in front of them made classes easier and more enjoyable. Thinking back on this conversation now, I wish I had gotten to ask about the connection between choice and relevance: does some autonomy over content increase relevancy? Or is relevancy something that is only tied directly to your life at that moment? Something to marinate on for sure.

The challenge going forward

Around the room throughout the day on flipchart paper were six questions that students could wander around and answer. The photo on the right about are students voices being heard really stuck with me, particularly the answer in the upper lefthand corner of the paper. There is a difference between listening to students and translating that listening into action. I’m looking forward to seeing the synthesis of all twenty table conversations from the day, to seeing the video stories that students shared, to see what the larger themes that came out of the event. More importantly though, I’m excited to see what changes are made after listening to our students.

A Little “Yes, And…’ Magic

At some point during the day yesterday, I got an email from the Stanford d school’s K-12 Design Lab discussing what they had been up to and the sort of programs they had coming up. One of the programs was the Shadow a Student challenge. The challenge is pretty simple: administrators follow a student around school for a day to build empathy and gain an understanding of a school from a student’s perspective. This seemed like an opportunity – to the Twitter machine!

Screen Shot 2018-01-23 at 6.42.40 AM

After tagging a bunch of administrators in the district I work in, I hoped there would be some interest. Well, Grant Frend had a better idea, AKA the first ‘yes, and…’ of the evening:

Screen Shot 2018-01-23 at 6.43.31 AM

Umm, yeah, that sounds like a good idea: shadow a student, some debrief conversations, maybe a beverage? That’s better than just shadowing a student for a day. Then Cheryl Schwarz chimed in with another ‘yes, and…’:

Screen Shot 2018-01-23 at 6.43.47 AM

Not just shadow a student, but then go shadow an admin? Get a look into another building for a day, see how other administrators do their job? That’s a really good way to see into other schools and learn routines and norms that other buildings have.

Shadow a Student day is still a few weeks off. How many SD42 administrators will end up participating? What will the structures that we use to debrief our experiences – both shadowing students and other administrators – end up looking like? I’m not sure what either of those answers are. However, I’m excited to see where the conversations head.

And all powered by a couple of ‘yes, and…’ ideas!

Weak Ties

As 2018 arrived, I spent some time thinking about weak ties and the pretty profound impact they’ve had on my life. Weak ties aren’t close friends. They aren’t colleagues or family. They’re loose connections who might share an interest or mutual friend group, but aren’t people you are tight with or know well. Interested in more on weak ties? If so, there are a couple links on the bottom of this post for you to read more about them.

What prompted this reflection was that I was lucky enough to get to spend an amazing 72 hours over the New Year on Oahu, staying with and getting toured around by people I had never met. While that might sound weird, it isn’t. Kind of. My wife met Ben Mountz at the Apple Distinguished Educator program in Miami in 2015. They hung out some, prepped for short talks they had to give, and got along well. Turns out Ben and his wife Jess were talking about moving to Hawaii.

Well, fast forward a couple years. Ben and Jess have moved to Oahu. We were headed to Maui but wanted to visit other islands at some point. Victoria and Ben chatted, we invited ourselves for New Years, and got to hang out with some amazing local tour guides – and educators – on Oahu for the end of 2017 and the beginning of 2018.

I had never met either Ben or Jess. We had something in common – education – and some mutual friends, but had never hung out.

Ben and Jess were weak ties. They clearly aren’t weak ties anymore, but before hanging out for a few days? Yes.

And that weak tie connection? Well, I got to see a huge chunk of Oahu, eat some great food, chat about education, and hang out with Jess and Ben (and their dogs!).

And all that was pretty awesome, actually. But it made me think about the impact that weak ties have had on my life.

My job as a secondary vice principal? I happened upon Grant Frend, a secondary principal, through the design thinking and education chat – the #dtk12chat – about 18 months ago. Grant was excited to see someone interested in the connection between DT and education. A weak tie.

We got to chatting. He invited me to come by and check out his school. We kept in contact, and when I was applying for administrative positions in districts around where I live – including in Grant’s district – I reached out to him for a hand with the application. I’m pretty positive I wouldn’t have the job I have now were it not for Grant. Is he a weak tie today? Not at all – I now consider him a friend and a mentor. But Grant was a weak tie who helped me get a job in a new part of the world for me.

My family – married, with a kid on the way? My wife was a weak tie, someone who I followed on Twitter because she was an educator and was a part of my buddy Sam Patterson’s old #patue chat. We met briefly when she headed to the Bay Area for a #cuerockstar event. We kept in touch, coplanned a conference presentation with my favorite crazy (but the good kind of crazy) Southern California educator John Stevens, and here we are 4.5 years later.

Oahu NS sunset
Jess and Victoria checking out a sunset on the North Shore of Oahu

That’s where I ended up as I was thinking about weak ties and three great days on Oahu: so much of what I’m doing today, both personally and professionally, is because of weak ties. Friends who knew people and connected me to them, or people that shared a common interest with me and reached out: weak ties. But also weak ties that led to amazing personal and professional opportunities. And weak ties that subsequently became strong ties.

It turns out that 72 hours in Oahu was a great time to prompt this reflection.


Interested in more on this weak ties thing? There’s a really good article about the importance of weak ties from TechCrunch here. It gets a bit into the weeds when talking about retention of people when hiring through weak ties, but the big ideas are there, Worth a read. And if you’re interested, the originator who pointed to the importance of weak ties was Mark Granovetter, who wrote this paper in 1973 (!!!).